[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <452a0296-7cdc-474b-b751-0c6c498e4190@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:12:48 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Lokesh Gidra
<lokeshgidra@...gle.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: madvise: use walk_page_range_vma() instead of
walk_page_range()
On 6/5/25 10:31, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
>
> We've already found the VMA within madvise_walk_vmas() before calling
> specific madvise behavior functions like madvise_free_single_vma().
> So calling walk_page_range() and doing find_vma() again seems
> unnecessary. It also prevents potential optimizations in those madvise
> callbacks, particularly the use of dedicated per-VMA locking.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>
> Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
> Cc: Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@...o.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Thanks!
> @@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ static long madvise_guard_install(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long nr_pages = 0;
>
> /* Returns < 0 on error, == 0 if success, > 0 if zap needed. */
> - err = walk_page_range_mm(vma->vm_mm, start, end,
> + err = walk_page_range_vma(vma, start, end,
> &guard_install_walk_ops, &nr_pages);
Nit: breaks the parameter alignment. Do we care? It's Lorenzo's code so
maybe not ;P
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
> @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static long madvise_guard_remove(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (!is_valid_guard_vma(vma, /* allow_locked = */true))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - return walk_page_range(vma->vm_mm, start, end,
> + return walk_page_range_vma(vma, start, end,
> &guard_remove_walk_ops, NULL);
Same.
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists