[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHVXubicfhkX15S=fSo2yQcSCUmA57cJATk6=ayy5OCWvRx0MA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:08:15 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, cyrilbur@...storrent.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the risc-v tree
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 6:23 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:35:13 PDT (-0700), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In commit
> >
> > 4e27ce58e7fa ("riscv: uaccess: Only restore the CSR_STATUS SUM bit")
> >
> > Fixes tag
> >
> > Fixes: 788aa64c0c01 ("riscv: save the SR_SUM status over switches")
> >
> > has these problem(s):
> >
> > - Target SHA1 does not exist
> >
> > Maybe you meant
> >
> > Fixes: b0feecf5b812 ("riscv: save the SR_SUM status over switches")
> > Fixes: 788aa64c01f1 ("riscv: save the SR_SUM status over switches")
> > or
> > Fixes: 8f9b274ad153 ("riscv: save the SR_SUM status over switches")
> >
> > (yes, they are all the same patch ... and all ancestors of 4e27ce58e7fa)
>
> Ya, thanks. Something's gone way off the rails here, let me try to
> figure it out...
I expected to send this fix (along with other fixes) next week, after
the -rc1 was released, with the proper fixes tag, so maybe Palmer you
can just drop it?
>
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists