linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/mm: Fix test result reporting in gup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d039ca05-da2f-4317-be04-34edb7ad3496@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 18:19:00 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/mm: Fix test result reporting in
 gup_longterm

On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 06:55:53PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 05.06.25 18:42, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I can't remember off hand, sorry.

> I assume in ... my review to patch #4?

Oh, yeah - it's there.  I did look there but the "not a fan" bit made me
think it was one of the stylistic things as I quickly scanned through.

> What an unpleasant upstream experience.

TBH this has been a lot better than the more common failure mode with
working on selftests where people just completely ignore or are openly
dismissive about them :/ .  Probably room for a middle ground though.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)