[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <beee85ae-8b36-4705-af96-1d65c40df215@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:34:28 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/mm: Fix test result reporting in
gup_longterm
On 05.06.25 19:19, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 06:55:53PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 05.06.25 18:42, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> I can't remember off hand, sorry.
>
>> I assume in ... my review to patch #4?
>
> Oh, yeah - it's there. I did look there but the "not a fan" bit made me
> think it was one of the stylistic things as I quickly scanned through.
>
>> What an unpleasant upstream experience.
>
> TBH this has been a lot better than the more common failure mode with
> working on selftests where people just completely ignore or are openly
> dismissive about them :/ . Probably room for a middle ground though.
Can we *please* limit such reworks to mechanical changes in the future?
It's just absolutely hard to spot these things during review (I did at
least on patch #4).
And Andrew apparently just merges them -- and I am left with the feeling
that we create more mess by "accident".
Anyhow, thanks for working on these tests ...
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists