[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a768123-4423-4f52-a0ef-96fa69872949@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 09:59:14 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Tal Zussman <tz2294@...umbia.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka
<vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/debug: Use BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID() for VIRTUAL_BUG_ON()
On 07.06.25 09:09, Tal Zussman wrote:
> This allows the compiler to validate the condition even with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL disabled, and aligns VIRTUAL_BUG_ON() with the
> other macros in mmdebug.h.
>
In the light of recent discussions, I think we should get rid of
VIRTUAL_BUG_ON completely.
There are only a hand full of callers, and I am preety sure for most of
them VM_WARN_ON is a suitable replacement.
> Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@...umbia.edu>
> ---
> include/linux/mmdebug.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmdebug.h b/include/linux/mmdebug.h
> index a0a3894900ed..012aef40e7a9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmdebug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmdebug.h
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void vma_iter_dump_tree(const struct vma_iterator *vmi);
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL
> #define VIRTUAL_BUG_ON(cond) BUG_ON(cond)
> #else
> -#define VIRTUAL_BUG_ON(cond) do { } while (0)
> +#define VIRTUAL_BUG_ON(cond) BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(cond)
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS
>
> ---
> base-commit: efe99fabeb11b030c89a7dc5a5e7a7558d0dc7ec
> change-id: 20250607-virtual_bug_on_invalid-81d24b276109
>
> Best regards,
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists