lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kNo94Wym-FGoYx=A7OK0N5itZaD8Jm7TbBB2P6s_zTOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 19:07:27 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>, 
	Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] rust: regulator: add a bare minimum regulator abstraction

On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 6:31 PM Daniel Almeida
<daniel.almeida@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> By the way, are you using some lint to generate this?

No, just my eyes :)

But I try to report upstream things that I think could be automated so
that eventually we need less time to catch this sort of thing, e.g. I
was just opening this one inspired by this patch:

    https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/15023

Plus these other two, which do not happen here, but are related:

    https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/15024
    https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/15025

Some of our suggestions did get implemented in the past by others
even, so that was great.

> Did you try to render this? I tried it before submitting, but it did not render
> correctly after the first time it was used, i.e.: only the first subsection was
> rendered correctly and the others remained as-is.

Yeah, I did -- it works fine for me.

I even checked that it generates a higher level HTML `<hN>` tag vs.
the main one, as expected in Markdown (I checked that because the font
was fairly similar in size, so it was hard to see).

Do you see something different?

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ