[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250609111719.gne4mhchivobyv3y@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:47:19 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: cpumask: Validate CPU number in set() and clear()
On 05-06-25, 21:37, Boqun Feng wrote:
> While this can fix the current problem, but it's not a good solution for
> the long run. Because outside a test, we should never use an arbitrary
> i32 as a cpu number (we usually get it from smp_processor_id(), or
> something else). So the `< nr_cpu_ids` testing is not necessary in
> normal use cases.
Thanks for the feedback Boqun.
I have sent a new version and hopefully took care of all the review
comments:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1749463570.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists