[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a6083df-9060-4d07-8293-304a3f5f6cdd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 14:25:34 +0200
From: Vadym Tytan <titanv3585@...il.com>
To: Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k@...il.com>
Cc: Roderick Colenbrander <roderick.colenbrander@...y.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: playstation: DS4: Add BT poll interval adjustment
> Do you have a strong use case or reason to add it back?
I wouldn't say *strong* per se, but if something:
- Can be adjustable
- I think if hardware is capable of such thing it's better to have
adjustment of it available to user.
- It's better to have an option then no option at all, let the user
decide.
- Doesn't break the hardware nor software
- When decreasing polling interval
- Battery impact is just faster discharging, it doesn't "breaks" it
- Bluetooth stack won't break, it could be just "overwhelmed"
- When increasing polling interval
- No negative impact at all (if we wouldn't count the user who can
set polling interval to like 63, and have choppy controls, that's why
defaults exists)
- Have benefits
- PI can be decreased for smoother controls in cost of battery life
- PI can be also increased to save battery in cost of smooth controls
- Doesn't impact anything nor anybody on defaults.
> The not adjustable referred to USB, which is not adjustable. So keep
> that one the way it is.
Oh, OK, I understood this in another way, but that make sense too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists