lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEb3wfr3rgL2Pemu@yury>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:03:29 -0400
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/topology: Fix for_each_node_numadist() lockup
 with !CONFIG_NUMA

On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 01:35:36PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> for_each_node_numadist() can lead to hard lockups on kernels built
> without CONFIG_NUMA. For instance, the following was triggered by
> sched_ext:
> 
>   watchdog: CPU5: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 5
>   ...
>   RIP: 0010:_find_first_and_bit+0x8/0x60
>   ...
>   Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>    cpumask_any_and_distribute+0x49/0x80
>    pick_idle_cpu_in_node+0xcf/0x140
>    scx_bpf_pick_idle_cpu_node+0xaa/0x110
>    bpf_prog_16ee5b1f077af006_pick_idle_cpu+0x57f/0x5de
>    bpf_prog_df2ce5cfac58ce09_bpfland_select_cpu+0x37/0xf4
>    bpf__sched_ext_ops_select_cpu+0x4b/0xb3
> 
> This happens because nearest_node_nodemask() always returns NUMA_NO_NODE
> (-1) when CONFIG_NUMA is disabled, causing the loop to never terminate,
> as the condition node >= MAX_NUMNODES is never satisfied.
> 
> Prevent this by providing a stub implementation based on
> for_each_node_mask() when CONFIG_NUMA is disabled, which can safely
> processes the single available node while still honoring the unvisited
> nodemask.
> 
> Fixes: f09177ca5f242 ("sched/topology: Introduce for_each_node_numadist() iterator")
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/topology.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  - Provide a stub implementation for the !CONFIG_NUMA case
>  - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250603080402.170601-1-arighi@nvidia.com/
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
> index 33b7fda97d390..97c4f5fc75038 100644
> --- a/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -304,12 +304,17 @@ sched_numa_hop_mask(unsigned int node, unsigned int hops)
>   *
>   * Requires rcu_lock to be held.
>   */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA

While there, can you expand this optimization to MAX_NUMNODES == 1
case?
        #if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) && (MAX_NUMNODES > 1)

With that:

Acked-by: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@...il.com>

Thanks,
Yury

>  #define for_each_node_numadist(node, unvisited)					\
>  	for (int __start = (node),						\
>  	     (node) = nearest_node_nodemask((__start), &(unvisited));		\
>  	     (node) < MAX_NUMNODES;						\
>  	     node_clear((node), (unvisited)),					\
>  	     (node) = nearest_node_nodemask((__start), &(unvisited)))
> +#else
> +#define for_each_node_numadist(node, unvisited)					\
> +	for_each_node_mask((node), (unvisited))
> +#endif
>  
>  /**
>   * for_each_numa_hop_mask - iterate over cpumasks of increasing NUMA distance
> -- 
> 2.49.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ