[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df6f5620-5986-4080-bb00-c7bee856bf66@t-8ch.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 17:34:33 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/nolibc: Provide vfork()
Small followup review, sorry for the noise.
On 2025-06-09 16:08:56+0100, Mark Brown wrote:
<snip>
> +#ifndef sys_vfork
This ifndef is not necessary here.
No architecture has a special version.
> +static __attribute__((unused))
> +pid_t sys_vfork(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef __NR_vfork
For consistency:
#if defined(__NR_vfork)
> + return my_syscall0(__NR_vfork);
> +#elif defined(__NR_clone3)
> + /*
> + * clone() could be used but has different argument orders per
> + * architecture.
> + */
> + struct clone_args args = {
> + .flags = CLONE_VM | CLONE_VFORK,
> + .exit_signal = SIGCHLD,
> + };
> +
> + return my_syscall2(__NR_clone3, &args, sizeof(args));
> +#else
> + return __nolibc_enosys(__func__);
> +#endif
> +}
> +#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists