linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1883d9d7-26d4-40b1-9848-ae0477cf95c7@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:02:43 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Wenmeng Liu <quic_wenmliu@...cinc.com>, rfoss@...nel.org,
 todor.too@...il.com, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 quic_depengs@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss

On 6/10/25 22:02, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 10/06/2025 13:49, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>
>>> List feedback from DT people is isp@ is the correct prefix.
>>>
>>
>> My bad, but I don't understand this comment, it seems irrelevant...
>>
>> The expressed concern is about the novel label name.
> 
> I mean to say the feedback from Krzysztof was that we should use isp@
> not camss@ and I agree.
> 

Let me repeat it thrice, it's okay...

I don't object against the properly selected device tree node name "isp",
here I object against a never used and very questionable label name "isp".

Please feel free to ask more questions, if you still find it confusing.

Again, I may missed a discussion about the need to get and use a novel
label name, then please share a link to it, it'll be very much appreciated.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir