linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc82457e-de2b-43ec-a50c-08f7d8bdeff1@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 20:02:43 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
 Wenmeng Liu <quic_wenmliu@...cinc.com>, rfoss@...nel.org,
 todor.too@...il.com, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 quic_depengs@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss

On 10/06/2025 13:49, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>
>> List feedback from DT people is isp@ is the correct prefix.
>>
> 
> My bad, but I don't understand this comment, it seems irrelevant...
> 
> The expressed concern is about the novel label name.

I mean to say the feedback from Krzysztof was that we should use isp@ 
not camss@ and I agree.

---
bod