[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <739bad1b-f26d-44a6-9cc1-eee28023474f@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:49:09 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Wenmeng Liu <quic_wenmliu@...cinc.com>, rfoss@...nel.org,
todor.too@...il.com, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
quic_depengs@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss
On 6/10/25 12:50, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 10/06/2025 10:48, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hello Wenmeng.
>>
>> On 5/16/25 10:27, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
>>> Add support for the camera subsystem on the SM8550 Qualcomm SoC. This
>>> includes bringing up the CSIPHY, CSID, VFE/RDI interfaces.
>>>
>>> SM8550 provides
>>> - 3 x VFE, 3 RDI per VFE
>>> - 2 x VFE Lite, 4 RDI per VFE
>>> - 3 x CSID
>>> - 2 x CSID Lite
>>> - 8 x CSI PHY
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wenmeng Liu <quic_wenmliu@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 210 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/
>>> dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
>>> index e9bb077aa9f0..722521496a2d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
>>> @@ -3326,6 +3326,216 @@ cci2_i2c1: i2c-bus@1 {
>>> };
>>> };
>>> + isp: isp@...7000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sm8550-camss";
>>> +
>>
>> This is the first time, when 'isp' label is used instead of 'camss', it
>> might
>> be I missed the context, is there any particular reason to do such a
>> change?
>>
>> If the label name is changed to the regular 'camss', then
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
>>
>> --
>> Best wishes,
>> Vladimir
>
> List feedback from DT people is isp@ is the correct prefix.
>
My bad, but I don't understand this comment, it seems irrelevant...
The expressed concern is about the novel label name.
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists