[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b792059e-44d2-82c0-574c-76c3f6a3129d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:35:50 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, corbet@....net, ikepanhc@...il.com,
hmh@....eng.br, W_Armin@....de,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] platform/x86: thinklmi: improved DMI handling
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Fix issues reported by kernel test robot.
> - Require DMI for think-lmi.
> - Check return from getting serial string
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506062319.F0IpDxF6-lkp@intel.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
> ---
> - New patch added to series.
>
> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c | 8 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/Kconfig
> index a4b565283768..207dd7f88ed0 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/Kconfig
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ config THINKPAD_ACPI_HOTKEY_POLL
> config THINKPAD_LMI
> tristate "Lenovo WMI-based systems management driver"
> depends on ACPI_WMI
> + depends on DMI
> select FW_ATTR_CLASS
> help
> This driver allows changing BIOS settings on Lenovo machines whose
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c
> index 143d9fdedb65..8f70c60f791f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.c
> @@ -772,6 +772,7 @@ static ssize_t certificate_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct tlmi_pwd_setting *setting = to_tlmi_pwd_setting(kobj);
> enum cert_install_mode install_mode = TLMI_CERT_INSTALL;
> char *auth_str, *new_cert;
> + const char *serial;
> char *signature;
> char *guid;
> int ret;
> @@ -789,9 +790,10 @@ static ssize_t certificate_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> return -EACCES;
>
> /* Format: 'serial#, signature' */
> - auth_str = cert_command(setting,
> - dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_SERIAL),
> - setting->signature);
> + serial = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_SERIAL);
> + if (!serial)
> + return -EINVAL;
This should not return -EINVAL as it is not a problem with the input
parameters. Perhaps -ENODEV would make sense instead?
> + auth_str = cert_command(setting, serial, setting->signature);
> if (!auth_str)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
>
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists