lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <33d3ea0d-161d-4297-9a99-9e7e129b31b1@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 21:21:45 -0400
From: "Mark Pearson" <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
To: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
 ikepanhc@...il.com, "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <hmh@....eng.br>,
 "Armin Wolf" <W_Armin@....de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
 ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] platform/x86: Move Lenovo files into lenovo subdir

Thanks Andy,

On Mon, Jun 9, 2025, at 4:17 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 08:27:24AM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
>> Create lenovo subdirectory for holding Lenovo specific drivers.
>
> ...
>
>>  LENOVO WMI HOTKEY UTILITIES DRIVER
>>  M:	Jackie Dong <xy-jackie@....com>
>>  L:	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
>>  S:	Maintained
>> -F:	drivers/platform/x86/lenovo-wmi-hotkey-utilities.c
>> +F:	drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/lenovo-wmi-hotkey-utilities.c
>
> Is this correct?
>
Jackie is on my team, he wrote this driver originally (with some help) for one of the thinkbook platforms.
If there are any changes he should review them as he has access to the HW, but I'll be helping too.
I think it's fine - let me know if otherwise.

Just as background: We can't use our Lenovo email addresses for kernel contributions. They're based on an awful Outlook server that is incapable of handling text only emails, and also won't play nice with any other tooling (including git send-email). Not ideal but it is what it is, and I gave up fighting with IT about it (there are some workarounds, but they're arguably worse).

> Otherwise LGTM.
>
Thanks for the review
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ