[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEf938EjRMODfJYq@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:41:51 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Benjamin Mugnier <benjamin.mugnier@...s.st.com>
Cc: Sylvain Petinot <sylvain.petinot@...s.st.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] media: i2c: vd55g1: Use first index of mbus codes
array as default
Hi Benjamin,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 11:31:11AM +0200, Benjamin Mugnier wrote:
> On 6/10/25 11:04, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Benjamin Mugnier wrote:
> >> Factorize code and prevent future erros in case of media bus codes
> >> change.
> >> Rename VD55G1_DEFAULT_MODE to VD55G1_MODE_DEF to mimic other macros
> >> while at it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Mugnier <benjamin.mugnier@...s.st.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c | 10 ++++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c b/drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c
> >> index dec6e3e231d54a742bdd08ff2a506c152bb89429..177caa5470cfcf49e0ae2fb568d7872a5608a11f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/vd55g1.c
> >> @@ -111,9 +111,9 @@
> >>
> >> #define VD55G1_WIDTH 804
> >> #define VD55G1_HEIGHT 704
> >> -#define VD55G1_DEFAULT_MODE 0
> >> +#define VD55G1_MODE_DEF 0
> >> #define VD55G1_NB_GPIOS 4
> >> -#define VD55G1_MEDIA_BUS_FMT_DEF MEDIA_BUS_FMT_Y8_1X8
> >> +#define VD55G1_MBUS_CODE_DEF 0
> >> #define VD55G1_DGAIN_DEF 256
> >> #define VD55G1_AGAIN_DEF 19
> >> #define VD55G1_EXPO_MAX_TERM 64
> >> @@ -1260,7 +1260,8 @@ static int vd55g1_set_pad_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >> static int vd55g1_init_state(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >> struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state)
> >> {
> >> - unsigned int def_mode = VD55G1_DEFAULT_MODE;
> >> + unsigned int def_mode = VD55G1_MODE_DEF;
> >> + unsigned int def_mbus_code = VD55G1_MBUS_CODE_DEF;
> >
> > Why the local variables?
> >
> >> struct vd55g1 *sensor = to_vd55g1(sd);
> >> struct v4l2_subdev_format fmt = { 0 };
> >> struct v4l2_subdev_route routes[] = {
> >> @@ -1278,7 +1279,8 @@ static int vd55g1_init_state(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> vd55g1_update_img_pad_format(sensor, &vd55g1_supported_modes[def_mode],
> >> - VD55G1_MEDIA_BUS_FMT_DEF, &fmt.format);
> >> + vd55g1_mbus_codes[def_mbus_code].code,
> >> + &fmt.format);
> >
> > I'd remove def_mode, too, and just use VD55G1_DEFAULT_MODE. The 80
> > characters per line is preferred but I think in this case using local
> > variables just to use them once doens't make the code easier to read.
> >
>
> You guessed correctly, local variables are here to avoid overflowing the
> 80 characters per line.
> If I put VD55G1_DEFAULT_MODE directly then checkpatch will fail. As I
> understand this is a hard requirement ?
It's not a hard requirement in media-ci, no. In some cases it's justified
to have longer lines than that (see V4L2 IOCTL definitions, for instance),
I don't mind if it happens above. You could also make the function name
shorter, it's pretty long. Up to you.
>
> I could do something like :
>
> const struct vd55g1_mode *mode =
> &vd55g1_supported_modes[VD55G1_MODE_DEF];
> const struct vd55g1_fmt_desc *mbus_code =
> &vd55g1_mbus_codes[VD55G1_MBUS_CODE_DEF];
> [...]
> vd55g1_update_img_pad_format(sensor, mode, mbus_code->code,
> &fmt.format);
>
> Which IMO improves readability, what do you think ?
I'd just do this without local variables.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists