lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7331326-8317-7e7e-809e-e61211cd7e0a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:54:04 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/33] serial: 8250: put RSA functions to their
 namespace

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote:

> Prefix the functions with rsa_, not suffix.
> 
> This is a preparation for moving them out to 8250_rsa.c in the next
> patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> index e7652d62ab2f..d8a90818f431 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static void serial8250_clear_IER(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>   * Attempts to turn on the RSA FIFO.  Returns zero on failure.
>   * We set the port uart clock rate if we succeed.
>   */
> -static int __enable_rsa(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> +static int __rsa_enable(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>  {
>  	unsigned char mode;
>  	int result;
> @@ -741,14 +741,14 @@ static int __enable_rsa(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>  /*
>   * If this is an RSA port, see if we can kick it up to the higher speed clock.
>   */
> -static void enable_rsa(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> +static void rsa_enable(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>  {
>  	if (up->port.type != PORT_RSA)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (up->port.uartclk != SERIAL_RSA_BAUD_BASE * 16) {
>  		uart_port_lock_irq(&up->port);
> -		__enable_rsa(up);
> +		__rsa_enable(up);
>  		uart_port_unlock_irq(&up->port);
>  	}
>  	if (up->port.uartclk == SERIAL_RSA_BAUD_BASE * 16)
> @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static void enable_rsa(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>   * unknown why interrupts were disabled in here. However, the caller is expected to preserve this
>   * behaviour by grabbing the spinlock before calling this function.
>   */
> -static void disable_rsa(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> +static void rsa_disable(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>  {
>  	unsigned char mode;
>  	int result;
> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static void rsa_autoconfig(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>  	if (!(up->probe & UART_PROBE_RSA))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (__enable_rsa(up))
> +	if (__rsa_enable(up))
>  		up->port.type = PORT_RSA;
>  }
>  
> @@ -806,8 +806,8 @@ static void rsa_reset(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>  	serial_out(up, UART_RSA_FRR, 0);
>  }
>  #else
> -static inline void enable_rsa(struct uart_8250_port *up) {}
> -static inline void disable_rsa(struct uart_8250_port *up) {}
> +static inline void rsa_enable(struct uart_8250_port *up) {}
> +static inline void rsa_disable(struct uart_8250_port *up) {}
>  static inline void rsa_autoconfig(struct uart_8250_port *up) {}
>  static inline void rsa_reset(struct uart_8250_port *up) {}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RSA */
> @@ -2268,7 +2268,7 @@ int serial8250_do_startup(struct uart_port *port)
>  				UART_DA830_PWREMU_MGMT_FREE);
>  	}
>  
> -	enable_rsa(up);
> +	rsa_enable(up);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Clear the FIFO buffers and disable them.
> @@ -2535,7 +2535,7 @@ void serial8250_do_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
>  			serial_port_in(port, UART_LCR) & ~UART_LCR_SBC);
>  	serial8250_clear_fifos(up);
>  
> -	disable_rsa(up);
> +	rsa_disable(up);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Read data port to reset things, and then unlink from
> 

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
 i.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ