[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEmEYLKw1qLiqN1U@e129823.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:28:00 +0100
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, pcc@...gle.com, will@...nel.org,
anshuman.khandual@....com, joey.gouly@....com,
yury.khrustalev@....com, maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
frederic@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, surenb@...gle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] kselftest/arm64/mte: refactor check_mmap_option
test
Hi Mask,
> > Before add mtefar testcase on check_mmap_option.c,
> > refactor check_mmap_option:
> > - make testcase suite array with test options (mem_type, mte_sync type and etc)
> > to use general testcase pattern
> >
> > - generate each test case name acoording to test options.
>
> I didn't specifically check that all the tests are the same but assuming
> they are:
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Yes. It doesn't change the all tests.
Thanks!
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists