[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEntuUxOGU1DA7Fu@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:57:29 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] Workqueue: add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:14:30PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> -extern struct workqueue_struct *system_wq;
> +extern struct workqueue_struct *system_wq; /* use system_percpu_wq, this will be removed */
> +extern struct workqueue_struct *system_percpu_wq;
> extern struct workqueue_struct *system_highpri_wq;
> extern struct workqueue_struct *system_long_wq;
> extern struct workqueue_struct *system_unbound_wq;
> +extern struct workqueue_struct *system_dfl_wq;
This patch is just adding the extern decls. Shouldn't these be created?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists