linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] Workqueue: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEnuj0LuIVWrszuv@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:01:03 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] Workqueue: replace use of system_wq with
 system_percpu_wq

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:14:31PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
>  110 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-)

I think this needs to be broken up per subsystem. Can you please post the
workqueue patches to add all the new things? I'll apply them to a branch and
then you can send out per-subsys patches with the description explaining
what's going on and asking how the patch should be routed including what wq
branch to pull from if the subsys wants to route the patches through their
tree.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun