[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF7ThUEqdg4sGe+LjxgH8VDn_BBVQqbagycGTQE1cECF6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:47:10 +0200
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] Workqueue: add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq
Yes, sorry, I messed up with the rebase.
Already fixed for the new version.
Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:57 PM Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:14:30PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> > -extern struct workqueue_struct *system_wq;
> > +extern struct workqueue_struct *system_wq; /* use system_percpu_wq, this will be removed */
> > +extern struct workqueue_struct *system_percpu_wq;
> > extern struct workqueue_struct *system_highpri_wq;
> > extern struct workqueue_struct *system_long_wq;
> > extern struct workqueue_struct *system_unbound_wq;
> > +extern struct workqueue_struct *system_dfl_wq;
>
> This patch is just adding the extern decls. Shouldn't these be created?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product
marco.crivellari@...e.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists