[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250611210728.266563-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 23:07:28 +0200
From: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@....de>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@....de>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@....de>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: syzbot+b5eb72a560b8149a1885@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix state use-after-free on push_stack() err
Without this, `state->speculative` is used after the cleanup cycles in
push_stack() or push_async_cb() freed `env->cur_state` (i.e., `state`).
Avoid this by relying on the short-circuit logic to only access `state`
if the error is recoverable (and make sure it never is after push_*()
failed).
push_*() callers must always return an error for which
error_recoverable_with_nospec(err) is false if push_*() returns NULL,
otherwise we try to recover and access the stale `state`. This is only
violated by sanitize_ptr_alu(), thus also fix this case to return
-ENOMEM.
state->speculative does not make sense if the error path of push_*()
ran. In that case, `state->speculative &&
error_recoverable_with_nospec(err)` as a whole should already never
evaluate to true (because all cases where push_stack() fails must return
-ENOMEM/-EFAULT). As mentioned, this is only violated by the
push_stack() call in sanitize_speculative_path() which returns -EACCES
without [1] (through REASON_STACK in sanitize_err() after
sanitize_ptr_alu()). To fix this, return -ENOMEM for REASON_STACK (which
is also the behavior we will have after [1]).
Checked that it fixes the syzbot reproducer as expected.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250603213232.339242-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de/
Fixes: d6f1c85f2253 ("bpf: Fall back to nospec for Spectre v1")
Reported-by: syzbot+b5eb72a560b8149a1885@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/38862a832b91382cddb083dddd92643bed0723b8.camel@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@....de>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index b1f797616f20..d3bff0385a55 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -14229,7 +14229,7 @@ static int sanitize_err(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
case REASON_STACK:
verbose(env, "R%d could not be pushed for speculative verification, %s\n",
dst, err);
- break;
+ return -ENOMEM;
default:
verbose(env, "verifier internal error: unknown reason (%d)\n",
reason);
@@ -19753,7 +19753,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
goto process_bpf_exit;
err = do_check_insn(env, &do_print_state);
- if (state->speculative && error_recoverable_with_nospec(err)) {
+ if (error_recoverable_with_nospec(err) && state->speculative) {
/* Prevent this speculative path from ever reaching the
* insn that would have been unsafe to execute.
*/
base-commit: 2d72dd14d77f31a7caa619fe0b889304844e612e
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists