[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad367080-5863-4131-b395-b39e2d357fb9@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:37:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: shao.mingyin@....com.cn
Cc: ulf.hansson@...aro.org, changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com,
geert+renesas@...der.be, magnus.damm@...il.com, heiko@...ech.de,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, walker.chen@...rfivetech.com,
sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, detlev.casanova@...labora.com,
finley.xiao@...k-chips.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, pgwipeout@...il.com,
qiu.yutan@....com.cn, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, yang.yang29@....com.cn,
xu.xin16@....com.cn, yang.tao172@....com.cn, ye.xingchen@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pmdomain: Use str_enable_disable-like helpers
On 11/06/2025 04:10, shao.mingyin@....com.cn wrote:
>>> From: Shao Mingyin <shao.mingyin@....com.cn>
>>>
>>> Replace ternary (condition ? "enable" : "disable") syntax and ternary
>>> (condition ? "on" : "off") syntax with helpers from
>>> string_choices.h because:
>>> 1. Simple function call with one argument is easier to read. Ternary
>>> operator has three arguments and with wrapping might lead to quite
>>> long code.
>>> 2. Is slightly shorter thus also easier to read.
>>> 3. It brings uniformity in the text - same string.
>>> 4. Allows deduping by the linker, which results in a smaller binary
>>> file.
>>
>> So you just taken everything from the same my patch - even entire commit
>> subject and commit description - and sent it as yours?
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250114203547.1013010-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>>
>> oh my, if doing EXACTLY the same keep original authorship - the From and
>> Sob fields.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> Dear Krzysztof,
> Thank you for your suggestions. I have carefully read your advice and
> made adjustments to the patches accordingly. I used your patch as a
> reference standard, not just taking everything from the same your patch.
>
> Based on your suggestion, I have consolidated the series of patches for
I did not suggest to take everything from my patch, add one missing
change and use as yours.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists