[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b137e6bb-7380-4f4c-8469-422587d08c60@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:17:42 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, psodagud@...cinc.com, djaggi@...cinc.com,
quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com, quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com,
quic_arandive@...cinc.com, quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com,
quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com, Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] dt-bindings: serial: describe SA8255p
On 10/06/2025 10:10, Praveen Talari wrote:
>>> +
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + minItems: 1
>>
>> Drop, this is not in sync with interrupt-names. You already received
>> comments on this. We talk about this since v4!
> I hope you have reviewed the commit message and the description under
> interrupt-name regarding the optional wakeup IRQ. I believe that address
> your query.
>
> I can include minItems:1 in the interrupt-name property in the next
> patch set to align/sync with interrupts property.
Yes, then the interrupt-names needs minItems.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists