linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Remove include/kvm, standardize includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <125bfa5b-4727-4998-a0da-fb50feec6df6@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 06:56:53 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
 Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Tianrui Zhao
 <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>,
 Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
 Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
 kvm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Anish Ghulati <aghulati@...gle.com>, Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
 Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Remove include/kvm, standardize includes

On 6/11/25 02:10, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Kill off include/kvm (through file moves/renames), and standardize the set of
> KVM includes across all architectures.
> 
> This conflicts with Colton's partioned PMU series[1], but this should work as
> a nice prepatory cleanup for the partitioned PMU work (and hopefully can land
> sooner).
> 
> Note, these patches were originally posted as part of a much larger and more
> agressive RFC[1].  We've effectively abandoned upstreaming the multi-KVM idea,
> but I'm trying to (slowly) upstream the bits and pieces that I think/hope are
> generally beneficial.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250602192702.2125115-1-coltonlewis@google.com
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230916003118.2540661-1-seanjc@google.com

Marc, Oliver, I'd like to commit this to kvm/next sometime soon; I'll 
wait for your ack since most of the meat here is in arch/arm64.

Thanks,

Paolo