[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6a57a82-c534-4439-a337-8592c2e121c5@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 15:46:50 +0530
From: Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@...com>
To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, <nm@...com>, <kristo@...nel.org>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <s-vadapalli@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<danishanwar@...com>, Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep: Add boot phase
tag to "pcie0_ep"
On 11/06/25 14:17, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote:
>
>
> On 11/06/25 14:14, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/06/25 11:19, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote:
>>> AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot
>>> on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be
>>> functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the
>>> "bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@...com>
>>> ---
>>> This patch is based on commit
>>> 475c850a7fdd Add linux-next specific files for 20250606
>>>
>>> Changes since v1
>>> As per feedback from Nishanth, changed the position of "bootph-all"
>>> tag, according to ordering rules for device tree properties.
>>>
>>> v1 :
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250609115930.w2s6jzg7xii55dlu@speckled/
>>>
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso
>>> index 432751774853..a7e8d4ea98ac 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso
>>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@...2000 {
>>> max-functions = /bits/ 8 <1>;
>>> phys = <&serdes0_pcie_link>;
>>> phy-names = "pcie-phy";
>>> + bootph-all;
>>> ti,syscon-pcie-ctrl = <&pcie0_ctrl 0x0>;
>>> };
>>> };
>>
>> Are the patches for PCIe boot support merged to U-Boot or such other
>> bootloader repo?
>> No, they are not in the U-Boot yet. I will be posting patches for PCIe
> boot support for U-Boot this week.
>
I have posted Patch series for the PCIe boot support in Uboot.
1.https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20250612084910.3457060-1-h-salunke@ti.com/
2.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20250612085023.3457117-1-h-salunke@ti.com/
3.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20250612085534.3457522-1-h-salunke@ti.com/
Regards,
Hrushikesh.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists