[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <738a889d-9bd5-40c3-a8f5-f76fcde512f4@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:04:47 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krishna Manikandan <quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/msm/dsi/phy: Fix reading zero as PLL rates
when unprepared
On 13/06/2025 17:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/06/2025 15:55, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>
>>> @@ -361,24 +373,47 @@ static int dsi_pll_7nm_lock_status(struct dsi_pll_7nm *pll)
>>>
>>> static void dsi_pll_disable_pll_bias(struct dsi_pll_7nm *pll)
>>> {
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> u32 data;
>>>
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pll->pll_enable_lock, flags);
>>> + --pll->pll_enable_cnt;
>>> + if (pll->pll_enable_cnt < 0) {
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pll->pll_enable_lock, flags);
>>> + DRM_DEV_ERROR_RATELIMITED(&pll->phy->pdev->dev,
>>> + "bug: imbalance in disabling PLL bias\n");
>>> + return;
>>> + } else if (pll->pll_enable_cnt > 0) {
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pll->pll_enable_lock, flags);
>>> + return;
>>> + } /* else: == 0 */
>>> +
>>> data = readl(pll->phy->base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_CMN_CTRL_0);
>>> data &= ~DSI_7nm_PHY_CMN_CTRL_0_PLL_SHUTDOWNB;
>>> writel(0, pll->phy->pll_base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_SYSTEM_MUXES);
>>> writel(data, pll->phy->base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_CMN_CTRL_0);
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pll->pll_enable_lock, flags);
>>> ndelay(250);
>>
>> What is this ndelay protecting? Is is to let the hardware to wind down
>> correctly? I'm worried about dsi_pll_disable_pll_bias() beng followed up
>> by dsi_pll_enable_pll_bias() in another thread, which would mean that
>> corresponding writes to the REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_CMN_CTRL_0 can come up
>> without any delay between them.
>>
>
> Great question, but why do you ask me? The code was there already and
> MSM DRM drivers are not something I know and could provide context about.
Because it's you who are changing the code as you've faced the issue
with recalc_rate.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists