linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] clocksource: Use cpumask_first_but() in clocksource_verify_choose

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87v7ozpom6.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 18:56:01 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
 jstultz@...gle.com, sboyd@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 eleanor15x@...il.com, visitorckw@...il.com, jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw,
 skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] clocksource: Use cpumask_first_but() in
 clocksource_verify_choose_cpus()

On Fri, Jun 13 2025 at 12:29, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 12:48:43PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> At this point it looks more like a lack of professionalism rather than
> an evil will, and I hope he'll do better next time.

Indeed.

> This doesn't mean that I revoke my NAK, or willing to give him any
> credit for this work. But I will review and take his patches in case
> he'll send something valuable to me; with reasonable precautions.

Fair enough.