linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Remove include/kvm, standardize includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEyR_bixN696F1sP@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:02:53 -0700
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>,
	Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anish Ghulati <aghulati@...gle.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM: Remove include/kvm, standardize includes

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 06:56:53AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 6/11/25 02:10, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Kill off include/kvm (through file moves/renames), and standardize the set of
> > KVM includes across all architectures.
> > 
> > This conflicts with Colton's partioned PMU series[1], but this should work as
> > a nice prepatory cleanup for the partitioned PMU work (and hopefully can land
> > sooner).
> > 
> > Note, these patches were originally posted as part of a much larger and more
> > agressive RFC[1].  We've effectively abandoned upstreaming the multi-KVM idea,
> > but I'm trying to (slowly) upstream the bits and pieces that I think/hope are
> > generally beneficial.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250602192702.2125115-1-coltonlewis@google.com
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230916003118.2540661-1-seanjc@google.com
> 
> Marc, Oliver, I'd like to commit this to kvm/next sometime soon; I'll wait
> for your ack since most of the meat here is in arch/arm64.

Let it rip, just to get ahead of potential conflicts can you push out a
topic branch?

Acked-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>

Thanks,
Oliver