linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iopoll: Use fsleep() instead of usleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEvl4yXPStVTotnx@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:48:35 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iopoll: Use fsleep() instead of usleep_range()

On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 04:43:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Use fsleep() instead of usleep_range() to improve small time delays
> by avoiding the timer use. With this, use slightly bigger initial
> delays then was passed to usleep_range().

Any comments anybody?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko