linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "platform/x86: alienware-wmi-wmax: Add G-Mode support to Alienware m16 R1"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174981658790.27029.16646984768467792319.b4-ty@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:09:47 +0300
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>, 
 Kurt Borja <kuurtb@...il.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Cihan Ozakca <cozakca@...look.com>, 
 stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "platform/x86: alienware-wmi-wmax: Add G-Mode
 support to Alienware m16 R1"

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:30:40 -0300, Kurt Borja wrote:

> This reverts commit 5ff79cabb23a2f14d2ed29e9596aec908905a0e6.
> 
> Although the Alienware m16 R1 AMD model supports G-Mode, it actually has
> a lower power ceiling than plain "performance" profile, which results in
> lower performance.
> 
> 
> [...]


Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo-fixes branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-fixes branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

The list of commits applied:
[1/1] Revert "platform/x86: alienware-wmi-wmax: Add G-Mode support to Alienware m16 R1"
      commit: e2468dc700743683e1d1793bbd855e2536fd3de2

--
 i.