linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] clocksource: Use better cpumask API where appropriate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y0tunqmq.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 20:07:41 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John
 Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Yury Norov [NVIDIA]" <yury.norov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] clocksource: Use better cpumask API where
 appropriate

On Sat, Jun 14 2025 at 11:50, Yury Norov wrote:
> From: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@...il.com>
>
> The dedicated API works better and improves on readability
>
> Resend: drop 'fix opencoded...' wording (Tomas)

This is not a resend as you changed the change log, so it's V3.

Resend is only for unmodified versions where you got no feedback and did
not change anything.

And in the RESEND case you have to keep the version number so stuff can
be identified as resend of a particular version.

People have scripts which depend on submitters following the
rules. Chasing stuff by hand is just waste of time.

Thanks,

        tglx