lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <rcazqdcr747ujkba6z2j2oci27ajkqfi4hydgc2kiavm73y37x@g63jga2fcwmo>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 15:35:43 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Antony Kurniawan Soemardi <linux@...nkusors.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Max Shevchenko <wctrl@...ton.me>, Rudraksha Gupta <guptarud@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: qcom: add device tree for Sony Xperia SP

On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 08:46:41PM +0000, Antony Kurniawan Soemardi wrote:
> On 6/15/2025 1:36 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > IIUC (and that's a 10yo range memory), SP had some eyebrow-rising boot
> > flow (some partitions were non-standard?) - could you please add a
> > paragraph about it in the commit message if that's the case, and maybe
> > include a short how-to on booting the thing?
> Is it acceptable to provide the pmOS wiki link in the commit message
> instead?
> https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Sony_Xperia_SP_(sony-huashan)
> 
> Or should I include a paragraph explaining it? It might be lengthy since
> I'd need to add download links for the mkelf and the RPM blob.
> 
> But in a nutshell, concatenate the kernel with the DTB, create a SonyELF
> boot image, and then boot it.
> 
> > As for the code.. I don't really have comments other than please
> > keep a \n before 'status', other things seem rather in order.. If
> > the dt checker doesn't complain, I don't see any logical wrongs
> > 
> > Konrad
> Thanks for the review. Going to sent the second version later.
> 
> As for the other things... well in my opinion it's not kinda in order,
> especially the nodes ordering at qcom-msm8960.dtsi. Welp that might be
> a separate patch I think...

Yes, those old platforms might enjoy some tender, love and care. Please
send separate patches, imroving node order, etc.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ