linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] media: uvcvideo: Enable keep-sorted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <61600bf6-92dc-49cd-bad9-a7342ce2fef9@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:38:08 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans@...erkuil.nl>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] media: uvcvideo: Enable keep-sorted

Hi Ricardo,

On 16-Jun-25 15:31, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 at 15:26, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ricardo,
>>
>> On 16-Jun-25 15:22, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
>>> Hi Hans
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 at 15:05, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ricardo,
>>>>
>>>> On 29-Apr-25 15:47, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
>>>>> When committers contribute quirks to the uvc driver, they usually add
>>>>> them out of order.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can automatically validate that their follow our guidelines with the
>>>>> use of keep-sorted.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset adds support for keep-sorted in the uvc driver. The two
>>>>> patches can be squashed if needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
>>>>
>>>> I've no objections against these 2 patches, but these need to be
>>>> rebased on top of the latest uvc/for-next. Can you send out a new
>>>> version please ?
>>>
>>> I was waiting for HansV to say that keep-sorted was useful and then
>>> add it to the CI.
>>
>> Ok, so should we drop this series from patchwork then ?
> 
> If the series does not bother you too much in patchwork let it stay
> there until HansV replies to the makefile series.

Sure that works for me.

Regards,

Hans