lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250616144718.4e8e12bf@batman.local.home>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 14:47:18 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux trace kernel
 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Masami
 Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
 <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Neal
 Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/tcp_ao: tracing: Hide tcp_ao events under
 CONFIG_TCP_AO

On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 16:30:03 +0100
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> wrote:

> I agree that the events and classes covered by this #define
> are not used unless CONFIG_TCP_AO is set. And that the small
> number of TCP_AO related events that are left outside
> the define are used even when CONFIG_TCP_AO is not set.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>

Thanks,

Should I take this or should this go through the networking tree?

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ