linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net/tcp_ao: tracing: Hide tcp_ao events under CONFIG_TCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250616131825.65e1c058@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:18:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux trace kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu
 Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Kuniyuki
 Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/tcp_ao: tracing: Hide tcp_ao events under
 CONFIG_TCP_AO

On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 14:47:18 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 16:30:03 +0100
> Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > I agree that the events and classes covered by this #define
> > are not used unless CONFIG_TCP_AO is set. And that the small
> > number of TCP_AO related events that are left outside
> > the define are used even when CONFIG_TCP_AO is not set.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>  
> 
> Should I take this or should this go through the networking tree?

Weak preference towards networking tree. We'll apply by the end of 
the day.