[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250617230334.GJ1376515@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 20:03:34 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@...il.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Alyssa Ross <hi@...ssa.is>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org,
Spectrum OS Development <devel@...ctrum-os.org>
Subject: Re: Virtio-IOMMU interrupt remapping design
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 04:01:53PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On x86 you also need to use remapping to exceed the max CPU count that
> > can be encoded in the MSI, no iommu required to need this.
>
> More of an x86 quirk though, isn't it?
Yes, but so is bundling IOMMU and remapping HW together <shrug>
GIC fully integrates it into the interrupt controller architecture.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists