[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89c8da9d-8e4c-4e68-b306-5645154b4d60@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 13:30:24 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Yogesh S <yogeshs@...com>,
Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>, Steam Lin <STLin2@...bond.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] spi: spi-mem: Take into account the actual maximum
frequency
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 02:14:19PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> In order to pick the best variant, the duration of each typical
> operation is derived and then compared. These durations are based on the
> maximum capabilities of the chips, which are commonly the limiting
> factors. However there are other possible limiting pieces, such as the
> hardware layout, EMC considerations and in some cases, the SPI controller
> itself.
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists