[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250617230024.322758dc@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 23:00:24 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: duchangbin <changbin.du@...wei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fgraph: Do not enable function_graph tracer when
setting funcgraph-args
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 02:40:21 +0000
duchangbin <changbin.du@...wei.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> > index 9234e2c39abf..b6211c304c7f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> > @@ -455,10 +455,16 @@ static int graph_trace_init(struct trace_array *tr)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct tracer graph_trace;
> > +
> > static int ftrace_graph_trace_args(struct trace_array *tr, int set)
> > {
> > trace_func_graph_ent_t entry;
> >
> > + /* Do nothing if the current tracer is no this tracer */
> typo: no -> not
Oops, thanks.
>
> > + if (tr->current_trace != &graph_trace)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> This can fix the issue. But how are tr->current_trace and &graph_trace linked?
> When are they equal?
register_tracer() passes in what tr->current_trace gets set to when the
tracer is active.
-- Steve
>
> > if (set)
> > entry = trace_graph_entry_args;
> > else
> > --
> > 2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists