[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <u326j22wteqtadni7wawvwbr6ai3h72iszwtfjwwbaztxj245c@5q4y7xlb3xnk>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:32:44 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Souradeep Chowdhury <quic_schowdhu@...cinc.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] remoteproc: Add device awake calls in rproc boot and
shutdown path
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 03:14:41PM +0530, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote:
> Device awake calls are only present in the recovery path of remoteproc.
This is not the problem, this merely documents a related fact. Might be
worth mention after the problem has been established.
> If an user stops and starts rproc by using the sysfs interface, then on
> pm suspension the firmware fails to load as the request_firmware call
> under adsp_load relies on usermodehelper process which gets freezed on
> pm suspension.
I asked why is this a problem, what happens when the usermodehelper
processes gets frozen, why does this cause an issue for the starting
remoteproc?
Why does it cause issues during shutdown?
Regards,
Bjorn
> Add device awake calls in the rproc boot and shutdown path
> to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chowdhury <quic_schowdhu@...cinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v6
>
> *Add some correction to commit message
>
> Changes in v5
>
> *Added more details to commit description
>
> Changes in v4
>
> *Remove stability from mailing list
> *Remove the extra tab in v3
> *Change the commit description
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index c2cf0d277729..5d6c4e694b4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1917,6 +1917,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
> dev = &rproc->dev;
>
> ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
> @@ -1961,6 +1962,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
> atomic_dec(&rproc->power);
> unlock_mutex:
> mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> + pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_boot);
> @@ -1991,6 +1993,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
> ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
> @@ -2027,6 +2030,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
> rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> + pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists