lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFL6PE-8KLLKZun_@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 20:41:16 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Andrew Ijano <andrew.ijano@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
	andrew.lopes@...mni.usp.br, gustavobastos@....br,
	dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org,
	jstephan@...libre.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] iio: accel: sca3000: simplify by using newer
 infrastructure

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 09:24:19AM -0300, Andrew Ijano wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:56 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 6:17 AM Andrew Ijano <andrew.ijano@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The sca3000 driver is old and could be simplified by using newer
> > > infrastructure.
> >
> > I haven't found any reference to a base commit here. Have you
> > forgotten to use --base when preparing the series?
> > In any case, please clarify what this series is based on.
> 
> Thank you for pointing this out! I think I forgot to use --base for
> it. In this case, should I submit a new version of the whole patchset
> with this information or is there a better way to do it?

For now just reply here what is the base. I asked this question above.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ