linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] iio: accel: sca3000: simplify by using newer infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANZih_S9_8OdY=oKyVPBCTSTqYm_z_rkE=xbPym3uHOSsHMv6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:24:19 -0300
From: Andrew Ijano <andrew.ijano@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, andrew.lopes@...mni.usp.br, gustavobastos@....br, 
	dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, 
	jstephan@...libre.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] iio: accel: sca3000: simplify by using newer infrastructure

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:56 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 6:17 AM Andrew Ijano <andrew.ijano@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The sca3000 driver is old and could be simplified by using newer
> > infrastructure.
>
> I haven't found any reference to a base commit here. Have you
> forgotten to use --base when preparing the series?
> In any case, please clarify what this series is based on.

Thank you for pointing this out! I think I forgot to use --base for
it. In this case, should I submit a new version of the whole patchset
with this information or is there a better way to do it?

Thanks,
Andrew