lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250618192713.20668-2-eeodqql09@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:27:14 -0400
From: Seungjin Bae <eeodqql09@...il.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	pip-izony <eeodqql09@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] usb: host: xhci-plat: fix incorrect type for of_match variable in xhci_plat_probe()

From: pip-izony <eeodqql09@...il.com>

The variable `of_match` was incorrectly declared as a `bool`.
It is assigned the return value of of_match_device(), which is a pointer of
type `const struct of_device_id *`.

Fixes: 16b7e0cccb243 ("USB: xhci-plat: fix legacy PHY double init")

Signed-off-by: Seungjin Bae <eeodqql09@...il.com>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
index 6dab142e7278..49eb874b1d81 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ int xhci_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct device *sysdev, const s
 	int			ret;
 	int			irq;
 	struct xhci_plat_priv	*priv = NULL;
-	bool			of_match;
+	const struct of_device_id *of_match;
 
 	if (usb_disabled())
 		return -ENODEV;
-- 
2.43.0

Hello Greg,

Thank you for your review and the helpful feedback.

I've corrected Signed-off-by line to use my real name.
I also updated Fixes tag in the commit.

Regarding the original issue:
I'm not exactly sure why the compiler didn't catch this,
but I assume implicit casting from pointer to bool is allowed in this context.

Thank you for your email!

Best regards,
Seungjin Bae

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ