[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ji24aaha6kcsemgagfw7expdesxcbrbd2uxxaonuof56xlbzog@sgewqljkd5qd>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:57:03 +0200
From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer: fix comments to reflect logical block size
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 09:48:50PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Hi Pankaj!
>
> > - /* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
> > + /* Size must be multiple of logical block size */
> > if (unlikely(size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)-1) ||
> > (size < 512 || size > PAGE_SIZE))) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "getblk(): invalid block size %d requested\n",
>
> OK with me. However, maybe that comment should just go away? The code on
> the following line articulates the constraint very clearly.
>
> If you tweak things, please fix the spacing for "(bdev)-1".
That makes sense. I will send a v2.
>
> Either way:
>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
>
Thanks
> --
> Martin K. Petersen
--
Pankaj Raghav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists