linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the jc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87jz57h6us.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:24:59 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: liu shouye <shouyeliu@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Shouye Liu
 <shouyeliu@...cent.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the jc_docs tree

liu shouye <shouyeliu@...il.com> writes:

> From: Shouye Liu <shouyeliu@...cent.com>
>
> In the AMD P-States Performance Scale diagram, the labels for "Max Perf"
> and "Lowest Perf" were incorrectly used to define the range for
> "Desired Perf".The "Desired performance target" should be bounded by the
> "Maximum requested performance" and the "Minimum requested performance",
> which corresponds to "Max Perf" and "Min Perf", respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shouye Liu <shouyeliu@...cent.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst
> b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst
> index 412423c54f25..e1771f2225d5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ to manage each performance update behavior. ::
>    Lowest non-        |                       |
>  |                       |
>    linear perf ------>+-----------------------+
>  +-----------------------+
>                       |                       |
>  |                       |
> -                     |                       |       Lowest perf
> ---->|                       |
> +                     |                       |          Min perf
> ---->|                       |
>                       |                       |
>  |                       |
>    Lowest perf ------>+-----------------------+
>  +-----------------------+
>                       |                       |
>  |                       |
> --
> 2.19.1

This patch has been severely white-space mangled by your mail client.
Care to retry after verifying that you can send patches without this
sort of interference?

Thanks,

jon