lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <393e7584-7ca1-407e-bd42-4079e5d8d4e2@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:24:04 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>, Chun-Tse Shao
 <ctshao@...gle.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf test: Add basic callgraph test to record testing



On 19/06/2025 1:24 am, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Give some basic perf record callgraph coverage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
>   tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> index 2022a4f739be..603fa6b79b5d 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> @@ -12,8 +12,10 @@ shelldir=$(dirname "$0")
>   . "${shelldir}"/lib/perf_has_symbol.sh
>   
>   testsym="test_loop"
> +testsym2="brstack"
>   
>   skip_test_missing_symbol ${testsym}
> +skip_test_missing_symbol ${testsym2}
>   
>   err=0
>   perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX)
> @@ -359,6 +361,23 @@ test_precise_max() {
>     fi
>   }
>   
> +test_callgraph() {
> +  echo "Callgraph test"
> +  if ! perf record -o "${perfdata}" -g perf test -w brstack

Looking at 2dac1f089 ("perf test: Fix 'perf script' tests on s390"), it 
looks like this won't work there. Although I'm not sure why the fix 
wasn't to change the default -g mode to dwarf on s390 if fp doesn't work 
at all. That wouldn't fix -e cpu-clock being required though.

Thanks
James


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ