[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFWZyPs4eBwGcKPu@thinkpad2024>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:26:32 -0400
From: "John B. Wyatt IV" <jwyatt@...hat.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Shinji Nomoto (Fujitsu)" <fj5851bi@...itsu.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpupower: Allow control of boost feature on non-x86
based systems with boost support.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 03:54:56PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 6/3/25 01:16, Shinji Nomoto (Fujitsu) wrote:
> > John Wyatt wrote:
> > > Did you test this on non-x86 systems? If so, would you please provide details on those architectures and systems?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch has been tested on Arm-based systems.
> >
> > * It was tested on our internal simulator based on QEMU which supports boost.
> > * It was tested on the Nvidia grace system (which does not support boost).
> > * The cppc_cpufreq driver is working on both of the above systems.
> >
> > We have also confirmed that it continues to work as expected on AMD systems.
> >
>
> John,
>
> Let me know if you are good with this testing details.
I have not tested it, but I the testing details are fine.
--
Sincerely,
John Wyatt
Software Engineer, Core Kernel
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists