[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<OS9PR01MB1400335E9E14CF505B8AD26DED95CA@OS9PR01MB14003.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 07:30:27 +0000
From: "Shinji Nomoto (Fujitsu)" <fj5851bi@...itsu.com>
To: "'John B. Wyatt IV'" <jwyatt@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan
<skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, John
Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Shinji Nomoto (Fujitsu)"
<fj5851bi@...itsu.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] cpupower: Allow control of boost feature on non-x86
based systems with boost support.
Hi, John and Shuah
Regarding the subject, I submitted patches to cpupower, but so far I haven't received confirmation that the content has been approved, nor does it appear to have been merged into the shuah/linux.git master branch.
Could you please inform me about the current status of the patches?
Thank you for your time and consideration.
----
Shinji Nomoto
-----Original Message-----
From: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@...hat.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2025 2:27 AM
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Nomoto, Shinji/ιζ¬ ηδΊ <fj5851bi@...itsu.com>; Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>; Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>; John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpupower: Allow control of boost feature on non-x86 based systems with boost support.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 03:54:56PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 6/3/25 01:16, Shinji Nomoto (Fujitsu) wrote:
> > John Wyatt wrote:
> > > Did you test this on non-x86 systems? If so, would you please provide details on those architectures and systems?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch has been tested on Arm-based systems.
> >
> > * It was tested on our internal simulator based on QEMU which supports boost.
> > * It was tested on the Nvidia grace system (which does not support boost).
> > * The cppc_cpufreq driver is working on both of the above systems.
> >
> > We have also confirmed that it continues to work as expected on AMD systems.
> >
>
> John,
>
> Let me know if you are good with this testing details.
I have not tested it, but I the testing details are fine.
--
Sincerely,
John Wyatt
Software Engineer, Core Kernel
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists