[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9012cc61-b499-4213-9753-54cf4d24c822@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:08:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Harshit Shah <hshah@...ado.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"soc@...ts.linux.dev" <soc@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: axiado: Add initial support for AX3000
SoC and eval board
On 20/06/2025 00:41, Harshit Shah wrote:
>>> +
>>> + spi_clk: spi_clk {
>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> + clock-frequency = <25000000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + apb_pclk: apb_pclk {
>> No underscores in node names, but all these look incorrect - don't you
>> have clock controller?
> Noted, we will remove the "_" from the nodes. We do have clock
> controller however that is being accessed by other CPU before Linux will
> come-up.
What does it mean? Is the clock controller not available at all for
Linux or any other OS?
>
> So, the purpose of this clock nodes is to calculate the frequencies for
> other peripherals. (We will update the nodes with clock-<freq>)
You do not calculate any frequencies here... You created nodes for fixed
clocks but I question here whether these are fixed clocks.
Where are these clocks located exactly?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists