[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFUTdnPTT6m0GBX0@yjaykim-PowerEdge-T330>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:53:26 +0900
From: YoungJun Park <youngjun.park@....com>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gunho.lee@....com,
taejoon.song@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/shmem, swap: improve mthp swapin process
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 01:55:37AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> + if (skip_swapcache) {
> + swapcache_clear(si, folio->swap, folio_nr_pages(folio));
> + folio->swap.val = 0;
> }
> + if (folio)
> + folio_put(folio);
> put_swap_device(si);
I really appreciate the patch. great work!
It's a rather trivial point, but I was wondering if the following change
might make sense:
...
if (skip_swapcache)
swapcache_clear(si, folio->swap, folio_nr_pages(folio));
put_swap_device(si);
if (folio)
folio_put(folio);
return error;
...
My intention here is to minimize the reference to si,
and from what I understand, this folio has already been allocated and would
soon disappear. Is it possible to to reduce the clear operation?
(folio->swap.val = 0)
Just a small suggestion.
Thank you again for your work!
Regards,
Youngjun Park
Powered by blists - more mailing lists